Showing posts with label Films. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Films. Show all posts

Wednesday, 10 August 2016

We're the patsies

Suicide Squad (2016) review (Semi-spoilery)

(TL;DR? Want the lowdown but not the spoilers? Skip to conclusion here)


SPOILER WARNING!

DO NOT GO BEYOND THIS IF YOU DO NOT WANT TO BE SPOILED!


I'VE WARNED YOU!


LAST ONE!

OKAY, IT'S ON YOU NOW. READY?

It can be agreed upon that Marvel started the whole superhero-movie trend of the 21st century with the release of the X-Men movie in 2000. However, the DC Extended Universe's (DCEU) Suicide Squad, directed by David Ayer, is not about heroes, it's about a group of locked-up super-baddies (and crazies) forced to play the role of saviors. And, as the movie tag goes, "Worst. Heroes. Ever."

Despite the difference, Suicide Squad left an impression that the DCEU is trying hard to play catch-up with the Marvel Cinematic Universe's (MCU) eight years of churning out blockbuster after blockbuster. Here's a tweet of mine, from after seeing the 2016 San Diego Comic Con Suicide Squad trailer, that will succinctly describe the movie:


Aside from the parallel, antithesis aspect, the makers of Suicide Squad took so many other elements from the MCU's movie-making book. If the DCEU were to mash-up and remix the MCU, this is the physical representation of that. Some of the glaring similarities were, obviously the team-up element from The Avengers (2012); the magic and large, all-powerful enemy sidekick cum distraction from Thor (2011); and the awesome soundtrack, that includes The Animals' Rising Sun and Queen's Bohemian Rhapsody, that is definitely a Guardians of the Galaxy (2014) thing. They even threw in a bit of Deadpool (2016) with some curse words and mild obscenity. There was a shortage on blood, though, which is strange for the grimness espoused by the DCEU.

Unfortunately, in their rush to make up for all the lost time and money that an expansive movie-franchise would give, they forgot the most important thing about stories—heart.

Suicide Squad poster
It's difficult to become invested in the characters. Indeed, the protagonists were felons and metahumans; the term DCEU uses for people with special abilities, but even criminals have lives other than doing crime. Though it does present a small backstory for each of the members, some being more extensive than others', it was not enough to have viewers rooting for them. The audience pretty much ends up as simple spectators, emotionally removed from the players and the events in that which they are watching. This is probably the pitfall of going ahead with an ensemble movie without going through the characters' stand-alones first.

The movie's attempt at winning the audiences' affections were not all in vain, even with heartless characters, both figuratively and literally. Funnily enough, it's the literally heartless one and Suicide Squad's ultimate antagonist, Enchantress (Cara Delevinge), who was easier to feel for; not even the person whose body she was inhabiting, Dr. June Moone.

Most of the consideration for June Moone is as an offshoot from sympathy for Rick Flag (Joel Kinnaman). Being her love-struck boyfriend, his dilemma of saving the world and saving his love is what fleshes them out.

Meanwhile, of the squad's members, it was Deadshot (Will Smith) who was the most successful at eliciting sentiment. His backstory and motivation were very human, and even succeeds at making Batman look like an asshole. This, for a movie about villains taking the lead, is a good thing.

Another unlikely placer in the likeability game was Killer Croc, played by Adwale Akinnuoye-Agbaje. His character was summarized by Viola Davis' Amanda Waller with the line "he looked like a monster, so they treated him like a monster, and he became a monster." Even with the life he had, he was one of the effective team-players in the story. It was uplifting when he confidently said he was beautiful, after openly being called ugly by Harley Quinn (Margot Robbie) who also quickly concurred with him.

El Diablo (Jay Hernandez), who Deadshot was constantly "trying to get there" after the former's self-imposed avoidance of using his abilities, had a backstory that was also trying to get the audience into sympathizing for him. Unfortunately, it felt a bit flat, not in the sense that his story wasn't tragic, but it was more on the pacing and how it was revealed.

There was a scene dedicated to generating condolence for the greatly under-utilized Katana (Karen Fukuhara), who was a grey-area good guy, but the scene seems mishandled, being out of character and coming up out of the blue. Giving the character—a somber, samurai wielding warrior— a midriff outfit also seemed a strange choice.

As for Captain Boomerang (Jai Courtney), well, the only things that make him emotionally accessible are his humor and attachment to a stuffed, pink unicorn.

Surprisingly for one of the main draws for Suicide Squad, and having the most flashback scenes, Harley Quinn didn't solicit much on the feels department, except during her heart-break scene. For it to work, though, they had to pull the cliche crying in the rain, then pretending to be alright once her teammates arrived.

It did not help that her backstory and flashbacks mostly served to introduce Jared Leto's Joker. One of these, which was partly featured in the trailers and was one of the most intriguing scenes, came up in the most unusual of moments that it could've been cut-out of the movie and the story would not be affected at all. It would be a waste of a good scene, agreed, but it would've been better used in a stand-alone Harley Quinn or Joker movie.

Speaking of Joker, now, I love Jared Leto as a fan of his band, but I've never seen any movie of his. His portrayal of Joker, though, seemed off. It was like he was reciting lines while pretending to play the Joker. However, his purr was quite impressive, sounding like a very formidable big-cat purring before they either cuddle or attack. Himself not being a part of the Suicide Squad, only popping up in flashbacks and interludes, there was a great want for more scenes of the Joker, especially since the marketing promised much. There was news stating that most of Joker's scenes ended up in the cutting-room floor and even Jared Leto was not happy about this.

 HERE IS WHERE I GET MORE SPOILERY. WATCH OUT!

With there not being much to make the characters endearing, the death (or possible death) of some(one) of them felt more like an acceptable fact than something to mourn about, and was quickly brushed off. This is unusual for characters who are supposedly part of the film's leads.

There was also a throw-away character whose sole purpose was only to demonstrate to the audience the actual existence and lethal quality of one of the plot devices. His scene could've been entirely removed from the story to save the company some time and money, but then, an actor won't have a job, even if it was a lousy one.

Despite it being hard to connect to the characters, there was one who was easy to hate. Amanda Waller was a cold, manipulative, and spoiled official. Having no character growth of any sort throughout the movie, even up to the mid-credit scene (yes, there is a mid-credit scene, so stay in your seats) she easily becomes very unlikable and even worse than the movie's antagonist. If this was what the DCEU was planning for the character, then they accomplished it.

Another problem for this movie was the great McGuffin that was supposed to unite squad members. The doomsday device was never explained (making it a great McGuffin) even after it was destroyed. All it did was give a sense of impending doom, but it was only a vague sense since the precise purpose of the device was never disclosed. For instance, if there was an outbreak of a virus that kills humans, and an outbreak of a virus that kills humans by turning them into rabid zombies, the latter would be more alarming.

All things considered, the movie wasn't at all that horrible as a lot of early reviewers would have you believe. It has its deficiencies, but all movies have these. On the flip-side, it's not all that great either due to the aforementioned drawbacks. If anything, it's a middling movie, still entertaining but not really one that is going to be lauded. For that, it deserves this star:

Sunday, 15 May 2016

Have you felt it?

Star Wars: The Force Awakens spoiler-free review


(Note: I started writing this somewhere in January, but failed to finish it sooner. Since TFA has been released in Blu-ray format last month (April), and in honor of May the 4th and Revenge of the 5th, I've decided to finalize and publish this review. I also just didn't want what I've already written to go to waste. This review is ideal for those considering whether the DVD/Blu-ray would be a good reason to part with their money, but also wouldn't want to be spoiled.)

Disclaimer: I'll try to make this as spoiler-free as possible, but I might accidentally slip-out something, so best approach with caution.


When I first saw Star Wars: The Force Awakens (SW:TFA), I tweeted this right after I got out of the cinema:
A month Months later (please see note below the subheading) and I continue to stand by this reaction of mine for the film. And yes, I'm already aware of George Lucas' true feelings for the movie.

I've read and heard a lot of complaints saying how unoriginal The Force Awakens (TFA) was. The way I see it is that it's exactly what it meant when it said "Every generation has a story".

Like some commercials for the film's merchandise or sponsors, to me, SW:TFA symbolizes the handing-down of the love for Star Wars to a generation whose parents probably haven't even hit puberty yet when the Original Trilogy (OT) first came out in cinemas.


(If you're curious, here are the commercials I was referring to)

As observed by some fans who've seen the OT when it premiered in the 70s and 80s, TFA tried to recreate the feeling that they had seeing Star Wars (now subtitled A New Hope) in theaters when it first came out when they were kids.

In a way, TFA was for the generation who've only heard stories of how and why the OT became so special to its fans when it premiered. Agreed, we could just watch copies of the OT to find out its appeal, but already having heard about all the secrets and plot twists, and that the available clear copies of the OT are all "special editions" with bits and pieces added or changed, it's different experiencing the magic of Star Wars first-hand without any sort of bias due to prior knowledge or exposure. That, I think, was what TFA was trying to give the new-blood fans, the excitement of discovering and experiencing for themselves a galaxy far, far away.

"Chewie, we're home"

SW:TFA charmingly connected the old with the new, roping in well-loved characters while successfully introducing the next generation. The plot and story, with all its Easter Eggs and throwbacks, reminds me that this was still the Star Wars universe despite George Lucas no longer helming the film and the screenplay or script. Here we have the same old toybox, but this time, it's the new kids' turn to play.

It's fun how they intertwined the story of the new characters with that of the originals, which was usually done by flipping the scenario and making the veterans put the newbies in some of the situations they were in back in A New Hope (ANH). These recollections are sometimes blatantly shown or just hinted at, partly making them inside jokes for those well versed with the OT.

One of the main gripes most people have with TFA because of these reminiscences is how close the plot resembles that of ANH. To me, it serves as a good jump-off point story for the new trilogy. The mirroring helps make TFA look the part of being in the same universe as the OT and Prequel Trilogy (PT) and not just another inter-galactic sci-fi story in space.

"Just let it in"

Being severed from its creator and assimilated into a franchise-churning, corporate entertainment giant has its drawbacks. With Marvel, which succeeded in its blockbuster movie franchise plan, also being under Disney's wing, there was great pressure on the TFA crew not only to please fans, but to also be able to duplicate Marvel's accomplishment.

Abrams and the TFA crew tried their best to deliver on all fronts. In this aspect, they were able to achieve their goal. There was something for every type of viewer, but it was given in average servings, like an aperitif to a multi-course meal, it gives a taste but its not filling, and is meant to whet the appetite for the rest of the franchise's upcoming installments.

In trying to please everyone, TFA suffers with too many things going on at a limited time. If it was a stage play, it has over four acts, all performed within two hours and 15 minutes. It was able to decently close every act, but it felt hurried; subsequent scenes immediately snapping one out from the moment and preventing viewers from taking in the emotion or depth of some scenes--that's to be done after you get home from the theater and when you have time to think about what just happened.

"Who are you?"

Unlike ANH which kick-started and served as the progenitor for the whole Star Wars universe, TFA was building on something that already existed, and people have their expectations based on the preceding six films.

The OT acquainted us with the main players in the SW universe while the PT gave us the back story to the villains and major supporting characters. TFA is the first of the series that will be doing a follow-up. Like ANH, it is given the privilege to introduce brand new characters while, at the same time, it is limited by the already established universe.

One of the differences between ANH and TFA is the existence of the internet. Back then, ANH could be independent of Empire Strikes Back (ESB) and Return of the Jedi (RotJ). The subsequent installments of the OT were completely at the mercy of The Maker, George Lucas, and the whole crew. Luke being Vader's son, and Leia being Luke's sister, almost nobody saw those coming, especially the latter one.

Nowadays, with the internet being ever present, it has become much easier to discuss theories regarding characters and events. Given enough clues and with the help of the whole online village, there have been theories regarding some shows and movies that proved to be correct.

This online speculation serves as both a blessing and a curse for TFA. On the downside, keeping the identities of the new characters secret or mysteries to be disclosed in subsequent installments has become a lot harder. On the other hand, this recent culture of idea-sharing and validation will help keep the interest for the rest of the films in the Sequel Trilogy (ST).

TFA was incredibly able to mitigate the negative effects of online speculation. There are a lot of mysteries regarding the new characters and situations that they were magnificently able to still keep under wraps, even after the film's release, reserved for the eventful reveal in the films to follow.

"There were stories about what happened"

Personally, I liked TFA. It's not perfect, but nothing ever is. With all the hurdles and expectations that it had to go through and live up to, I think Abrams and the crew of TFA were able to sufficiently and adequately give a fitting sequel to the OT and a perfectly positioned foundation for the rest of the ST.

For all that it has accomplished, to me, TFA deserves 3.5 to 4 stars.